No, and the difference matters. We give reads: a reasoned direction, the factors that support it with their weights, the confidence and the condition that voids it. How much to buy, at what price to enter and where to get out remain your decisions.
Analysis lists the scenarios and leaves you there. A read weighs those scenarios and says which one prevails, by how much and until when. The price of that choice is that sometimes we are wrong in a verifiable way: that is what the public record is for.
The main cryptocurrencies by market cap and liquidity, the most widely covered US stocks and the major indices with their futures. On thin markets we publish no reads: the data cannot carry the weighting.
Three to eight on average, plus the morning bulletin. In flat weeks few come out: that is the correct behavior, not a fault. Better no read at all than a forced one.
That the picture is highly consistent with itself: almost every factor pushes the same way and the data is clean. It is not a probability of profit, nor a historical success rate. A read at 72 can be wrong, and the record tells you how often that has happened.
In two distinct places. The weights come from statistical models trained on how the factors have held up historically. The text of the read is written by a language model that starts only from the weights already computed: it cannot invent a factor the model has not seen.
From licensed market-data and on-chain providers, plus public sources such as macro calendars and company filings. Every read states how many feeds went into it; on Lab you can also see which ones.
Because the sum of the weights does not clear 45: the factors cancel each other out and the picture leans nowhere. In that case the line stays flat. It is a choice of method, not a shortage of content.
A read is a hit if, within the stated horizon, the market moves in the direction indicated beyond the noise threshold; it is a miss if it moves the opposite way beyond that same threshold; it is void if the invalidation condition triggers before expiry. The criterion is fixed when the read goes out, not afterwards.
No, but you do need to manage risk yourself. The reads are written in plain English and every technical term is explained the first time it appears. If you are looking for someone to make your trades for you, Sinottica is not for you.
In Plancia, the working picture where the open reads and the record live. Alongside it you get emails and Telegram messages when a read opens, changes weight or is voided. With Lab you can also receive the changes by webhook.
From a few days to a few weeks, stated on every read. Below the scale of days noise dominates the weights: intraday is not our trade.
With Lab yes, if the stock has enough data to carry the weighting. If it doesn't, we tell you instead of producing a read that doesn't stand up.
Yes, from your profile, without writing to anyone. The subscription stays active until the end of the period you paid for, then you go back to the Free plan. The public record remains accessible afterwards.
Your email address and billing details serve to run the service and nothing else: no resale to third parties, no promotions on behalf of brokers. You can ask for an export or a deletion at any time.
No. Sinottica is an information tool: it publishes market analysis, not personal advice or portfolio management. The reads take no account of your financial situation and are not investment advice.
Write to us: we answer within two working days, in person.